Murder At The Brightwell (2014) by Ashley Weaver

Amory Ames has had enough of her jet-setting husband Milo, and when she gets an invitation from an old flame, Gil, she announces that their marriage is over and heads for the Brightwell, a hotel on the South Coast. Gil’s sister Emmeline is on the verge of marrying the undesirable Rupert Howe, and Gil hopes that Amory’s experiences with Milo can help persuade Emmeline to call of the union.

But Gil has plans to rekindle his relationship with Amory, but that plan has two significant hurdles. First of all, Rupert is found at the bottom of the cliff with his head bashed in. And secondly, Milo arrives, as what better catalyst could there be for reviving a relationship than investigating a murder with his estranged wife?

You may recall (although I doubt it) that I asked around to find the final six books for my reading challenge for the year – books written in the present day that were or were not properly clued mysteries. Well, as so many books these days have a quote or two comparing the book to the work of Dame Agatha, I thought I’d fill the final slots with books that boasted such comparisons. So let’s check this one… “Especially recommended to fans of Agatha Christie” – yup, it qualifies.

This one is set in 1932 in England, the sort of England that you think of in a Christie novel, namely mostly involving the upper-middle class with the servants being out of sight and out of mind. The author makes a point of being a tad nebulous on detail, possibly in part to her being based in the US. She does a good job of establishing the setting, although there are a couple of slips – the hotel is described as being on the southern coast, rather than the South Coast and it was a long time before the 1930s when people referred to the chemists as the Apothecary. But there’s a refreshing lack of the need to deliver a message about the politics of the time. I do enjoy those books that give a genuine history lesson alongside the mystery plot, but sometimes it’s good to just have a bit of fun. Ashley Weaver’s writing style – in the first person from Amory – is light and breezy, and the situation that Amory finds herself in is something that I haven’t seen before, and it creates an interesting dynamic and plot questions beyond who the murderer is.

This is a fun page-turner, mostly due to the central characters. I would read this one before checking the blurbs for later books as it does mean that one avenue of suspicion would be closed off to the reader, but the interplay between Amory and Milo, as she tries to work out exactly what he’s up to while trying to find a murderer is a highlight of the book.

But let’s go back to that line – “especially recommended to fans of Agatha Christie”. I wonder, how much Christie has the reviewer who wrote that read? Maybe it’s recommended so that fans of Dame Agatha can say, with authority, that no one comes close to her magnificence. Or is it, as I’ve often suspected, the average mystery reader doesn’t give two hoots for actual clues but just sees the mystery as a guessing game? Because that is what this is – the plot has more in common with that multitude of American cosy books due to it mostly consists of nosing around until the murderer gets a bit bored and sticks a gun in the sleuth’s face. But I do have a soft spot for the occasional dip into that genre…

But while the central mystery here isn’t a highlight, this is an entertaining story of an investigation that kept me occupied for a few hours, enjoying the company of the lead characters. Worth a look, but, as I said, don’t expect a Christie-esque puzzle… Of course, it’s worth pointing out that this is the author’s first book – who knows what is to come? I’ll let you as I’ll be back sooner or later…


  1. I read this one last year and found it to be a fun read, as well. It definitely is NOT on par with Agatha Christie, but it still makes for a decent cozy novel. I haven’t read any of the remaining books in the series, but it was a book I felt I enjoyed enough to want to continue reading at some point. Great review!


  2. I enjoyed this one too, albeit with the same sorts of issues you point to about the clueing. I really enjoy the relationship between Amory and Milo and my memory is that I liked the second installment just as much.


  3. Yeah, I remember reading Murder At The Brightwell not that long ago and while the book beautifully conveys the 1930’s and is fair in its accuracy, I felt that the mystery itself weren’t up to the standard of an Agatha Christie, and that’s rather hard to do. Christie made it look so easy and it ‘s not, that’s the genius of Christie! There was a bit of information in the denouement that was never hinted at beforehand (unless I overlooked it) and the author Ashley Weaver could have incorporated some sleight of hand to show some fairness in the solution. I also felt that the other characters weren’t as strong and memorable as I would have liked. Amory, Milo, Gil made more an impression on me than the other characters. I did like the playwright and wanted more of him; I guess that’s the writer in me that wanted that, but we go nowhere with him. However, I will read more of Ashley Weaver’s Amory Ames series in the future and hope that the mysteries and insertion of clues will be a bit better, as well as more memorable characters.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. One thing I did like in the denouement was a part of the motive did have some of the same Christie provided the murderer(s) in Death On The Nile but much better handled and more of a surprise from the latter.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.