The Haunting (1997) by Paul Doherty

October 1866, and Father Oliver Grafeld is summoned by Archbishop Manning to undertake a delicate task – an exorcism. For Oliver has an ability, to see the unseen and to drive it out. But he has never faced anything as deadly as what is lurking in Candleton Hall.

Lady Seaton is at her wits end – voices, knocking, pools of blood and an horrendous woman dressed in black are plaguing the house and her in particular – and Oliver is the only person who can possibly help. But when deaths begin and the Presence stalking the house begins to target Oliver, it is a race against time to solve the mysteries of the house’s past, to ensure everyone involved has a future.

This has been sitting on my Kindle for about eight years – I’m usually pretty bad at reading non-series books from authors who have series that I enjoy, so it’s not unusual. It’s fair to say I wasn’t sure what to expect from this one, so I put it into my 2020 Vision challenge to make me read. So now I’ve read it. Good for me.

Let me be clear, in case you missed the near 100 reviews that I’ve posted of Paul’s work, I love his work – beautiful depictions of history, involving lead characters, complex mysteries, generally with massive body counts… If memory serves, there was one book that didn’t grab me. One of Paul’s series, The Canterbury Tales is different from the rest, as it features some supernatural elements. That’s not a problem, as some of these are excellent books, notably A Haunt Of Murder, which I really must get round to reading again soon – there’s a wonderful use of the supernatural element in a fair play mystery. But one of the books, Ghostly Murders, didn’t work for me, mainly as it wasn’t really a mystery. It was a ghost story first and foremost, which isn’t my sort of thing.

So which was The Haunting most like? A Haunt Of Murder (yay!) or Ghostly Murders (boo!)?

Unfortunately, the second.

There’s every possibility that fans of ghost stories will enjoy this one, but not me. In particular, I didn’t find it particularly scary, which I imagine is pretty important in a ghost story. There were no particular surprises in the motivations and revelations, and the historical detail didn’t seem to be anywhere near as deep as in Paul’s usual writing.

Go and read almost anything else by Paul – there are so many great historical mysteries out there – but this isn’t a mystery and it didn’t work for me. I may be in the minority as it seems to be one of Paul’s highest rated books on Goodreads… what do I know, anyway?

4 comments

    • I was waiting for a twist regarding the identity of the instigator of the haunting – but at the end of the day, it was the fact that it just wasn’t scary. Still, there’s a new Hugh Corbett coming soon, so all will be well…

      Like

    • The Nightingale Gallery, the first Athelstan book, is an obvious choice for me – just re-read it a few posts ago and it’s a good marker as to whether Paul is the author for you or not. If you’ve got access to an e-reader, most of his stuff, especially the early Athelstan and the Hugh Corbett series (but start from The Prince Of Darkness, book five) are excellent choices. If you’re a “real book” reader, the new Corbetts are good, but I’d dive into the second hand market as there are a lot under £3. And if you need to check a review, I’ve reviewed almost all of them…

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.