The Bride of Newgate (1950) by John Dickson Carr

It’s a very bad habit of mine that when I find an author I like, I collect rigorously those books featuring his or her detective and get much less fussy when it comes to non-series books. However, occasionally I spot something on eBay and this is how I came into possession of my copy of The Bride of Newgate by John Dickson Carr. I figured that a book by the master of the locked room and impossible crime was an excellent candidate for the letter J in the Alphabet of Crime Fiction.

Set in 1815, The Bride of Newgate tells the story of Dick Darwent, framed for a murder and rotting in Newgate Prison awaiting execution. Caroline Ross needs to marry in order to inherit her estates and so arranges to marry Dick, assuming he will quickly die. Needless to say, due to rather bizarre circumstances, he is reprieved and sets about using his new position as the Marquess of Darwent to write some wrongs and find the real murderer. And, to no surprise to anyone, fall in love with his new wife.

If you’re expecting the usual Carr impossibilities, you may be a little disappointed, as while there is an impossibly vanishing murder scene – with a very simple resolution, there is considerably more swashbuckling than you might expect. It’s a pretty solid mystery though, but it is frequently punctuated with action, mostly involving duels. It’s kind of hard to pin down which character the detective is supposed to be, but it does follow the tradition of only revealing the villain at the end – part of the reveal is a nice surprise, the other part might make you scratch your head – it’s a bit of a jump to the true killer, but, I guess, there are enough hints.

The story jogs along at a decent pace, and the central characters are interesting, although you do want to slap Darwent on occasion. One of the problems is the book is so full of pompous army types who persist on annoying Darwent, I found myself losing track of the central plot on occasion. I sometimes felt that I should be making notes as to who’s who as I went, but, as it transpired by the end, everything that needed to be clear was clear enough.

The other problem is that the history of the book is so well researched (some characters and situations actually occurred) is that Carr cannot resist the urge to historical facts left, right and centre. Some are interesting, but some are just showing off – e.g. “Dick, you’re a revolutionary, just like that Thomas Paine” and they stand out a bit as odd.

The character of Caroline gets some pretty short shrift as well, almost immediately falling in love with Darwent. Carr does a pretty good job of keeping the conflict going between them, but the somewhat artificial device of Darwent’s dying ex-ladyfriend is handled somewhat clunkily.

According the mighty Wikipedia, this is considered to be the first historical mystery – it isn’t. Agatha Christie’s Death Comes As The End was written in 1944, predating this by six years. It is Carr’s first attempt and is free of the somewhat silly time-travelling antics that occur in Fire, Burn and The Devil In Velvet. This was written at a time when all of Carr’s best work (with the exception of The Nine Wrong Answers) was behind him, but I find it hard to compare with the Gideon Fell novels, simply because it’s a different sort of book. If you want a mystery-thriller set in 1815, then this is probably the book for you. But forgive me if I revert to Gideon Fell or Sir Henry Merrivale the next time I want to be reminded of how great Carr was.


  1. Thanks for reviewing this one – Carr’s historicals in the 1950s were amongst his most popular apparently and yet seem to have fallen badly out of favour now. I actually don’t mind the time travel element, especially for DEVIL IN VELVET which has a supernatural flavour anyway, but it is certainly harder to justify with FIRE, BURN although I consider that to be a very good book as well. I haven’t read FEAR IS THE SAME under the Carter Dickson and I think it’s the only one of the time travel ones I’ve missed.


  2. I’m glad you chose Carr–he’s one of my favorites. But I stand firmly with those who prefer his Gideon Fell and Sir Henry Merrivale stories. I just can’t do his historical novels.


    • I do like some of his other non-series stuff, like The Nine Wrong Answers, and in terms of the historicals, I do like The Witch of the Low-Tide, but I quite agree – Merrivale and Fell are much superior (with the very best books being Merrivale, in my opinion).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.